In this complicated novel there are many twists and turns when it comes to the creation of this old tale of Frankenstein. This author, Mary Shelley, puts together different letters, characters, and references to other works in order to make this novel seem worthy to be read, but did she put too much effort towards it? A novel do not have to consist of complexed spelling words, multiple references to different works, or lengthy chapters in order to get a point and story across. Reading is a task that is suppose to be enjoyable and inspiring. I think Gerald Graff would agree to this opinion as well, no one gains any type of lesson from literature that is boring to them. Reading is suppose to be interesting and straight to the point.
This novel begins with an introduction from the author then to letters from Walton to his sister about a story of Victor Frankenstein and his path to creating his monster. After Walton tells his sister about this creature then the creature becomes the narrator and tells his side of the story. With each letter there is a story that has a whole different view point and plot inside of it. The format of the novel is too complex for its meaning. Yes, the author is trying to portray a story through literature of an old tale but why should it be a puzzle to understand? Why should readers have to flip the page back and forth and try to understand the for example, “paradise Lost” is a refrence that she is trying to put in the story.
Another point in this novel where the author is trying to make the plot of the novel critical is Victor Frankestein’s monster in general. This monster is looked as a horrifying creature, but in this novel Shelley makes this monster have not only feelings for how people are scared of him but somewhat “educated.” For example, in chapter 10 the monster is arguing with Victor about “how [he] must be hated” (93) amongst the people. This author turns this tale of this creature into a tale of a creature that recognizes not only what people think of him but also efficient syntax and grammer.
In conclusion, Shelley produced too much critical perspective into this novel in order to make it contemporary. If the novel was less complex it would of had more of the exploration to the point she was trying to reach.
February 20, 2010 at 6:57 pm |
One way i make sense of all the complications surround the different storytellers and writing and reading is that Shelley focuses on the power of creativity–and authorship as a kind of creation. Victor as a writer–and the monster as his text, one that he writes perhaps too hastily.